4.6 Article

A quantitative study of the structure-activity relationship in hierarchical zeolites using liquid-phase reactions

期刊

AICHE JOURNAL
卷 65, 期 3, 页码 1067-1075

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.16503

关键词

hierarchical zeolites; liquid-phase alkylation and etherification; kinetics; reaction-diffusion modeling; surface topology

资金

  1. Petroleum Institute of Abu Dhabi, part of Khalifa University of Science and Technology
  2. Petroleum Institute of Abu Dhabi, as part of the Catalysis Center for Energy Innovation, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001004]
  3. National Creative Research Initiative Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A3A2048833]
  4. National Science Foundation [CBET-1264599]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Micro/meso/macroporous (hierarchical) zeolites show remarkable catalytic performance for reactions involving bulky reactants. However, quantitative assessment of the microstructural characteristics contributing to the observed performance remains elusive. Here, structure-activity relationships are established for a set of micro/mesoporous self-pillared pentasil (SPP) zeolites using two parallel liquid-phase reactions (benzyl alcohol alkylation and self-etherification) based on analysis of mass transport and reaction kinetics. A reaction-diffusion mathematical model is developed that quantitatively assigns the catalytic contributions of the external surface and micropores of SPP zeolites for these reactions. In addition, the effect of the zeolite external surface structure on the corresponding catalytic activity is quantitatively assessed by comparing SPP zeolites (with MFI structure) with MCM-22 (with MWW structure). This work demonstrates that reaction-diffusion modeling allows quantitative description of the catalytic performance of hierarchical zeolites and provides a model reaction to assess nm-sized characteristic diffusion lengths in MFI. (c) 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据