4.6 Article

Methanolic extract of Tamarix Gallica attenuates hyperhomocysteinemia induced AD-like pathology and cognitive impairments in rats

期刊

AGING-US
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 3229-3248

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.101627

关键词

Alzheimer disease; Tamarix Gallica (TG); homocysteine; tau; Amyloid-beta(A beta); cognitive impairments

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81571255, 31771114, 31528010]
  2. Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81721005]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFC1305800]
  4. Huazhong University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although few drugs are available today for the management of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and many plants and their extracts are extensively employed in animals' studies and AD patients, yet no drug or plant extract is able to reverse AD symptoms adequately. In the present study, Tamarix gallica (TG), a naturally occurring plant known for its strong antioxidative, anti-inflammatory and anti-amyloidogenic properties, was evaluated on homocysteine (Hcy) induced AD-like pathology and cognitive impairments in rats. We found that TG attenuated Hey-induced oxidative stress and memory deficits. TG also improved neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation by upregulating synaptic proteins such as PSD95 and synapsin 1 and downregulating inflammatory markers including CD68 and GFAP with concomitant decrease in proinflammatory mediators interlukin-1 beta(IL1 beta) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha). TG attenuated tau hyperphosphorylation at multiple AD-related sites through decreasing some kinases and increasing phosphatase activities. Moreover, TG rescued amyloid-beta (A beta) pathology through downregulating BACE1. Our data for the first time provide evidence that TG attenuates Hey-induced AD-like pathological changes and cognitive impairments, making TG a promising candidate for the treatment of AD-associated pathological changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据