4.6 Article

Identification of an energy metabolism-related signature associated with clinical prognosis in diffuse glioma

期刊

AGING-US
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 3185-3209

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.101625

关键词

glioma; energy metabolism; signature; prognosis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)/Research Grants Council (RGC) Joint Research Scheme [81761168038]
  2. National Key Research and Development Plan [2016YFC0902500]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81672479, 81773208]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Now, numerous exciting findings have been yielded in the field of energy metabolism within glioma cells. In addition to aerobic glycolysis, multiple catabolic pathways are employed for energy production. However, the prognostic significance of energy metabolism in glioma remains obscure. Here, we explored the relationship between energy metabolism gene profile and outcome of diffuse glioma patients using The Cancer Genome Altas (TCGA) and Chinese Glioma Genome Altas (CGGA) datasets. Based on the gene expression profile, consensus clustering identified two robust clusters of glioma patients with distinguished prognostic and molecular features. With the Cox proportional hazards model with elastic net penalty, an energy metabolism-related signature was built to evaluate patients' prognosis. Kaplan-Meier analysis found that the acquired signature could differentiate the outcome of low and high-risk groups of patients in both cohorts. Moreover, the signature, significantly associated with the clinical and molecular features, could serve as an independent prognostic factor for glioma patients. Gene Ontology (GO) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) showed that gene sets correlated with high-risk group were involved in immune and inflammatory response, with the low-risk group were mainly related to glutamate receptor signaling pathway. Our results provided new insight into energy metabolism role in diffuse glioma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据