4.5 Article

Sampling efficiency of low-volume PM10 inlets with different impaction substrates

期刊

AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 53, 期 3, 页码 295-308

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2018.1559919

关键词

-

资金

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 105-2622-8-009-007-TE4, MOST 105-2221-E-009-005-MY3, MOST 107-2622-8-009-004-TE5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The louvered 16.7 L min(-1) PM10 inlet is commonly used in PM10 and PM2.5 FRM samplers or FEM monitors. Its sampling efficiency is influenced by particle bounce, re-entrainment, and overloading since the PM10 inlet contains a PM10 impactor with an uncoated impaction surface. In this study, a modified PM10 (M-PM10) inlet with an oil-soaked glass fiber filter substrate supported by an oil-soaked porous metal disc was developed to eliminate the particle bounce and overloading effects. The oiled M-PM10 inlet and the traditional PM10 inlets with and without grease coating were collocated at the field for long-term comparison tests. The results show that the traditional uncoated PM10 inlet which is cleaned initially but not cleaned daily afterwards oversamples PM10 concentration after one 24-h sampling day and has the high positive average sampling bias during 14 sampling days due to particle bounce and re-entrainment. The grease-coated PM10 inlet without daily cleaning shows a better performance with a smaller sampling bias, but it still oversamples PM10 concentrations after the first three 24-h sampling days and then undersamples after 10 sampling days due to particle bounce and overloading effects, respectively. In comparison, the M-PM10 inlet shows a good performance with a small average sampling bias during 35 sampling days since vacuum oil wicks up through the deposit to eliminate particle bounce and overloading. It is suggested that the oiled M-PM10 inlet can be used to replace the traditional EPA PM10 inlet and for long-term sampling of over 1 month without the frequent maintenance need. Copyright (c) 2019 American Association for Aerosol Research

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据