4.7 Article

Image-based micro-continuum model for gas flow in organic-rich shale rock

期刊

ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 70-84

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.10.004

关键词

Shale gas; Nanoporous media; Micro-continuum; Darcy-Brinkman-Stokes

资金

  1. NERC-UK [NE/M001458/1]
  2. Research Complex at Harwell
  3. European Union Horizon 2020 716 Research and Innovation Program under the ShaleXenvironmenT project [640979]
  4. TOTAL through the Stanford TOTAL enhanced modeling of source rock (STEMS) project
  5. NERC [NE/M001458/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The physical mechanisms that control the flow dynamics in organic-rich shale are not well understood. The challenges include nanometer-scale pores and multiscale heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of the constituents. Recently, digital rock physics (DRP), which uses high-resolution images of rock samples as input for flow simulations, has been used for shale. One important issue with images of shale rock is sub-resolution porosity (nanometer pores below the instrument resolution), which poses serious challenges for instruments and computational models. Here, we present a micro-continuum model based on the Darcy-Brinkman-Stokes framework. The method couples resolved pores and unresolved nano-porous regions using physics-based parameters that can be measured independently. The Stokes equation is used for resolved pores. The unresolved nano-porous regions are treated as a continuum, and a permeability model that accounts for slip-flow and Knudsen diffusion is employed. Adsorption/desorption and surface diffusion in organic matter are also accounted for. We apply our model to simulate gas flow in a high-resolution 3D segmented image of shale. The results indicate that the overall permeability of the sample (at fixed pressure) depends on the time scale. Early-time permeability is controlled by Stokes flow, while the late-time permeability is controlled by non-Darcy effects and surface-diffusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据