4.8 Article

An Electron/Ion Dual-Conductive Alloy Framework for High-Rate and High-Capacity Solid-State Lithium-Metal Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201804815

关键词

electron/ion dual-conductive frameworks; garnet-type electrolytes; lithium-metal anodes; lithium-magnesium alloys; solid-state batteries

资金

  1. US Department of Energy Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy [DE-AR0000384]
  2. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy [DE-EE0006860]
  3. Maryland Nanocenter, its Surface Analysis Center
  4. AIMLab
  5. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201706280132]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The solid-state Li battery is a promising energy-storage system that is both safe and features a high energy density. A main obstacle to its application is the poor interface contact between the solid electrodes and the ceramic electrolyte. Surface treatment methods have been proposed to improve the interface of the ceramic electrolytes, but they are generally limited to low-capacity or short-term cycling. Herein, an electron/ion dual-conductive solid framework is proposed by partially dealloying the Li-Mg alloy anode on a garnet-type solid-state electrolyte. The Li-Mg alloy framework serves as a solid electron/ion dual-conductive Li host during cell cycling, in which the Li metal can cycle as a Li-rich or Li-deficient alloy anode, free from interface deterioration or volume collapse. Thus, the capacity, current density, and cycle life of the solid Li anode are improved. The cycle capability of this solid anode is demonstrated by cycling for 500 h at 1 mA cm(-2), followed by another 500 h at 2 mA cm(-2) without short-circuiting, realizing a record high cumulative capacity of 750 mA h cm(-2) for garnet-type all-solid-state Li batteries. This alloy framework with electron/ion dual-conductive pathways creates the possibility to realize high-energy solid-state Li batteries with extended lifespans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据