4.8 Article

A Programmed Anti-Inflammatory Nanoscaffold (PAIN) as a 3D Tool to Understand the Brain Injury Response

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 50, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201805209

关键词

3D cell culture; disease modeling; inflammation; nanoscaffolds; regenerative medicine

资金

  1. NHMRC [GNT1144996]
  2. ARC discovery project [DP130103131]
  3. Australian Postgraduate Award
  4. NHMRC Research Fellowship [GNT1020401]
  5. NHMRC Dementia Research Leadership Fellowship [GNT1135687]
  6. Australian Microscopy and Microanalysis Research Facility (AMMRF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immunology is the next frontier of nano/biomaterial science research, with the immune system determining the degree of tissue repair. However, the complexity of the inflammatory response represents a significant challenge that is essential to understand for the development of future therapies. Cell-instructive 3D culture environments are critical to improve our understanding of the link between the behavior and morphology of inflammatory cells and to remodel their response to injury. This study has taken two recent high-profile innovationsfunctional peptide-based hydrogels, and the inclusion of anti-inflammatory agents via coassemblyto make a programmed anti-inflammatory nanoscaffold (PAIN) with unusual and valuable properties that allows tissue-independent switching of the inflammatory cascade. Here, extraordinary durability of the anti-inflammatory agent allows, for the first time, the development of a 3D culture system that maintains the growth and cytoskeletal reorganization of brain tissue, while also facilitating the trophic behavior of brain cells for 22 d in vitro. Notably, this behavior was confirmed within an active scar site due to the unprecedented resilience to the presence of inflammatory cells and enzymes in the brain. Efficacy of the culture system is demonstrated via novel insights about inflammatory cell behavior, which would be impossible to obtain via in vivo experimentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据