4.8 Article

Defect-Induced Pt-Co-Se Coordinated Sites with Highly Asymmetrical Electronic Distribution for Boosting Oxygen-Involving Electrocatalysis

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201805581

关键词

asymmetrical electronic distribution; atomic metal species; oxygen evolution; selenium vacancies; synergetic interaction

资金

  1. International Postgraduate Research Scholarship (IPRS)
  2. UQ Centennial Scholarship (UQCent)
  3. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DE180101030]
  4. ARC [DP170103317, DP170104660, FT120100720]
  5. Australian Research Council [DE180101030] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rational design and synthesis of hetero-coordinated moieties at the atomic scale can significantly raise the performance of the catalyst and obtain mechanistic insight into the oxygen-involving electrocatalysis. Here, a facile plasma-photochemical strategy is applied to construct atomically coordinated Pt-Co-Se moieties in defective CoSe2 (CoSe2-x) through filling the plasma-created Se vacancies in CoSe2-x with single Pt atomic species (CoSe2-x-Pt) under ultraviolet irradiation. The filling of single Pt can remarkably enhance the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) activity of CoSe2. Optimal OER specific activity is achieved with a Pt content of 2.25 wt% in CoSe2-x-Pt, exceeding that of CoSe2-x by a factor of 9. CoSe2-x-Pt shows much better OER performance than CoSe2-x filled with single Ni and even Ru atomic species (CoSe2-x-Ni and CoSe2-x-Ru). Noticeably, it is general that Pt is not a good OER catalyst but Ru is; thus the design of active sites for electrocatalysis at an atomic level should follow a different intrinsic mechanism. Mechanism studies unravel that the single Pt can induce much higher electronic distribution asymmetry degree than both single Ni and Ru, and benefit the interaction between the Co sites and adsorbates (OH*, O*, and OOH*) during the OER process, leading to a better OER activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据