4.8 Article

Screening Approach for the Discovery of New Hybrid Perovskites with Efficient Photoemission

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201806728

关键词

hybrid perovskite; photoluminescence; screening; white LEDs

资金

  1. National Agency for Research (ANR) [ANR-16-CE08-0003-01]
  2. Region Pays de la Loire (Etoiles montantes en Pays de la Loire)
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-16-CE08-0003] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Owing to quantum confinement, low-dimensional hybrid perovskite materials have recently shown a great potential for applications in optoelectronics. Such compounds can exhibit broad- or narrow-band light emission, low-temperature solution processability, high thermal stability, and relatively high photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQY). However, the search for efficient phosphors with a specific set of characteristics remains difficult because the family of hybrid perovskites consists in an extremely large chemical system (i.e., different halides, metals, and organic molecules), and optical properties are not predictable prior to material synthesis and characterization. Here, is proposed a simple approach to screen a significant amount of new hybrid lead halide perovskites. The synthetic method by fast crystallization at low temperature enables the rapid identification of the materials exhibiting the targeted photoluminescence properties. This approach is tested for the discovery of hybrid lead halide perovskites with efficient white-light emission. Among 100 newly synthesized compounds, 5 exhibit intense white emission, and the in-depth characterization of a selected candidate shows high color rendering index (CRI) = 78 and a PLQY of 9%, which is equivalent to the record reported for hybrid perovskites. This compound exhibits a new structure type for warm white-light emitting hybrid perovskites with chains of corner-sharing PbX6.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据