4.8 Article

Achieving Amorphous Ultralong Room Temperature Phosphorescence by Coassembling Planar Small Organic Molecules with Polyvinyl Alcohol

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201807243

关键词

coassembly; distorted molecules; flexible luminescence films; planar molecules; ultralong organic phosphorescence

资金

  1. Singapore Academic Research Fund [RG11/17, RG114/17]
  2. Singapore Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR) AME IRG [A1883c0005]
  3. Singapore National Research Foundation Investigatorship [NRF-NRFI2018-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development of novel strategies for achieving amorphous ultralong organic phosphorescence (UOP) at room temperature is highly desired. Herein, a simple approach is reported by coassembling small organic molecules with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) to afford amorphous UOP. These small organic molecules with planar conformation present quenched triplet state emission in an excessive stacking solid state. When coassembling these molecules with PVA, their planar structures are well confined in coassembly films. Such a confined environment leads to restricted molecular rotation and vibration, permitting these molecules to show stable triplet state and generate UOP. In control studies, corresponding structurally distorted molecules are also coassembled with PVA. However, they exhibit very weak or quenched UOP, since distorted structures with molecular rotation and vibration could easily dissipate the excitation energy in dilute film state. By employing this polymer confinement strategy, multicomponent luminescence dyes are further coassembled with PVA for multicolor luminescence displays, providing multicolor, uniform, and flexible luminescence films. This work demonstrates a general strategy of employing small organic molecules to coassemble with PVA to obtain amorphous UOP, which greatly expands the scope of organic molecules for developing simple but useful UOP films.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据