4.6 Article

Compressive Properties of 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Matrix Composites Reinforced by Short Fibers and SiC Nanowires

期刊

ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adem.201800539

关键词

3D printing; compressive properties; fused deposition modeling; polylactic acid matrix composites; SiC nanowires

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51772246, 51272210, 50902112, U1737209]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0474]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3102017jg02001, 3102018jcc002]
  4. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals
  5. Northwestern Polytechnical University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) as a rapidly growing additive manufacturing technology is successfully applied to several industries. In this study, effects of printing layer thickness, reinforcement types, and silicon carbide nanowire (SiCnw) brushing layers on compressive properties are investigated by comparing the strength and modulus of the FDM specimens acquired from compression tests. First of all, the printing layer thickness determines the strength of the printed specimens, the pure polylactic acid (PLA), the PLA reinforced by short carbon fiber (C-f/PLA), and the PLA reinforced by graphene (G/PLA). The results indicate that both strength and elastic modulus of the printed specimens increase with the decrease of the printing layer thickness. Therefore, the effects of different reinforcement types on the mechanical properties are further investigated at the same printing layer thickness. It indicates that the printed C-f/PLA receives the highest elastic modulus up to 1.69 GPa due to the high modulus of carbon fiber. Finally, the SiCnw brushing layers between the printed PLA layers are found to significantly increase the compressive modulus and there is a growth of 55.1% from pure PLA to PLA with three SiCnw brushing layers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据