4.4 Article

Outcomes of intraocular lens scleral fixation with the friction knot technique

期刊

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 97, 期 4, 页码 E506-E513

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aos.13931

关键词

pars plana vitrectomy; postoperative complications; pseudoexfoliation; retinal detachment; uveitis-glaucoma-hyphaema syndrome; vitreous haemorrhage

资金

  1. Mary and Georg C Ehrnrooth Foundation, Helsinki, Finland [201600013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To examine the clinical outcomes of intraocular lens (IOL) scleral fixation with the friction knot technique. Methods Retrospective case series of 152 eyes of 152 patients with inadequate capsular bag support operated with the friction knot IOL scleral fixation technique by a single surgeon. The fixated IOLs were one-piece or three-piece models all with open loop haptics. Main outcome measures were change in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and postoperative complications. Results The mean follow-up time was 11.7 months (median 4.9, range 0.7-64.8). The mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution CDVA improved from preoperative 0.77 +/- 0.73 (Snellen 20/118 +/- 7.3 lines) to 0.44 +/- 0.56 (Snellen 20/55 +/- 5.6 lines) at the final visit (p < 0.001). The main postoperative complications were ocular hypertension (30.3%), uveitis-glaucoma-hyphaema syndrome (12.5%; UGHS), vitreous haemorrhage (11.2%) and retinal detachment (8.6%). Two (1.3%) cases of suture breakage were seen. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, age under 60 years [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95-15.01] and scleral fixated one-piece IOL (HR = 4.23; 95% CI 1.44-12.44) were found as significant independent risk factors for developing new UGHS. Conclusion The friction knot technique provides a firm scleral fixation. Scleral fixation may successfully be utilized in dislocated three-piece IOLs with loop haptics. We recommend avoiding scleral fixation of one-piece IOLs in young patients due to a high risk of UGHS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据