期刊
ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
卷 136, 期 5, 页码 663-689出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-018-1918-8
关键词
-
资金
- Boyarsky family
- Battersby family
- David King and family
The dominant hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) aetiology, the neuropathological guidelines for diagnosing AD and the majority of high-profile therapeutic efforts, in both research and in clinical practice, have been built around one possible causal factor, amyloid-beta (A beta). However, the causal link between A beta and AD remains unproven. Here, in the context of a detailed assessment of historical and contemporary studies,we raise critical questions regarding the role of A beta in the definition, diagnosis and aetiology of AD. We illustrate that a holistic view of the available data does not support an unequivocal conclusion that A beta has a central or unique role in AD. Instead, the data suggest alternative views of AD aetiology are potentially valid, at this time. We propose that an unbiased way forward for the field, beyond the current A beta-centric approach, without excluding a role for A beta, is required to come to an accurate understanding of AD dementia and, ultimately, an effective treatment.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据