4.2 Article

In silica analysis of different signal peptides to discover a panel of appropriate signal peptides for secretory production of Interferon-beta 1b in Escherichia coli

期刊

ACTA BIOCHIMICA POLONICA
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 521-534

出版社

ACTA BIOCHIMICA POLONICA
DOI: 10.18388/abp.2018_2351

关键词

bioinformatics; in silica; signal peptide; Interferon-beta 1b; recombinant protein; E. coli

资金

  1. University of Guilan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Signal peptides (SPs) are one of the most important factors for suitable secretion of the recombinant heterologous proteins in Escherichia coli (E. coli). The objective of this study was to identify a panel of signal peptides (among the 90 biologically active SPs) required for the secretory production of interferon-beta 1b (IFN-beta 1b) recombinant protein into the periplasmic space of E. coli host. In the initial step, after predicting the accurate locations of the cleavage sites of signal peptides and their discrimination scores using SignalP 4.1 server, 31 SPs were eliminated from further analysis because their discrimination scores were less than 0.5 or their cleavage sites were inappropriately located. Therefore, only 59 SPs could be theoretically applied to secrete IFN-beta 1b into the periplasmic space of E. coli. The physico-chemical and the solubility properties, which are necessary parameters for selecting appropriate SPs, were predicted using ProtParam and SOLpro servers using the 59 remaining signal peptides. The final subcellular localization of IFN-beta 1b in combination with different SPs was predicted using ProtComB server. Consequently, according to the ranking of 59 confirmed SPs, the obtained results revealed that SPs Flagellar P-ring protein (flgl), Glucan 1,3-beta-glucosidase I/II (EXG1) and outer membrane protein C (OmpC) were theoretically the most potent and desirable SPs for secretion of recombinant IFN-beta 1b into the periplasmic space of E. coli. For further studies in the future, the experimental investigations on the obtained results will be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据