4.8 Article

Improving the Performance of DNA Strand Displacement Circuits by Shadow Cancellation

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 11689-11697

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b07394

关键词

DNA nanotechnology; DNA strand displacement circuits; leak reduction; detection; molecular programming

资金

  1. NSF [CCF-1320360, CCF-1217457, CCF-1617791, CCF-1813805]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA strand displacement circuits are powerful tools that can be rationally engineered to implement molecular computing tasks because they are programmable, cheap, robust, and predictable. A key feature of these circuits is the use of catalytic gates to amplify signal. Catalytic gates tend to leak; that is, they generate output signal even in the absence of intended input. Leaks are harmful to the performance and correct operation of DNA strand displacement circuits. Here, we present shadow cancellation, a general-purpose technique to mitigate leak in catalytic DNA strand displacement circuits. Shadow cancellation involves constructing a parallel shadow circuit that mimics the primary circuit and has the same leak characteristics. It is situated in the same test tube as the primary circuit and produces anti-background DNA strands that cancel background DNA strands produced by leak. We demonstrate the feasibility and strength of the shadow leak cancellation approach through a challenging test case, a cross-catalytic feedback DNA amplifier circuit that leaks prodigiously. Shadow cancellation dramatically reduced the leak of this circuit and improved the signal-to background difference by several fold. Unlike existing techniques, it makes no modifications to the underlying amplifier circuit and is agnostic to its leak mechanism. Shadow cancellation also showed good robustness to concentration errors in multiple scenarios. This work introduces a direction in leak reduction techniques for DNA strand displacement amplifier circuits and can potentially be extended to other molecular amplifiers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据