4.8 Article

Spider-Web-Inspired NanocompositeModified Separator: Structural and Chemical Cooperativity Inhibiting the Shuttle Effect in Li-S Batteries

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 1563-1573

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b07491

关键词

ZIF-67; spider web; nanocomposite; modified separator; Li-S batteries

资金

  1. National Key Projects for Fundamental Research and Development of China [2016YFB0100104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91534109]
  3. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project [D171100005617001]
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2184124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite their high theoretical capacity density (1675 mAh g(-1)), the application of Li S batteries has been seriously hindered by the shuttle effect of polysulfides. Here, inspired by the working principle of natural spider webs, we synthesized a spider-web-like nanocomposite in which many hollow mesoporous silica (mSiO(2)) nanospheres/Co nanoparticles were threaded by interconnected nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes (NCNTs). Then the nanocomposite (denoted as Co/mSiO(2) NCNTs) was coated on the commercial separator by a simple infiltration to mitigate the above issue. The intimate combination of three-dimensional conductive networks (NCNTs) with abundant polysulfide adsorbent sites (SiO2 and N)/polysulfide conversion catalysts (Co and Co N species) allows the Co/mSiO(2) NCNTs coating layer to not only effectively capture polysulfides via both physical confinement and chemical bonding but also accelerate the redox kinetics of polysulfides significantly. Furthermore, the combination of ex situ experiment and theoretical calculation demonstrates that the reversible adsorption/desorption of polysulfides on mSiO(2) nanospheres benefits uniform deposition of Li2S2/Li2S on the conductive networks, which contributes to long-term cycling stability. As a result, Li S batteries with Co/mSiO(2) NCNTs-coated separators exhibited both excellent cycling stability and rate performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据