4.8 Article

Adsorption and Diffusion of Benzene in Mg-MOF-74 with Open Metal Sites

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 4686-4700

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b20447

关键词

benzene; adsorption; diffusion; molecular simulation; MOF-74

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676006]
  2. CHEMCLOUDCOMPUTING project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We performed molecular simulations to investigate the adsorption and diffusion of benzene in metal-organic framework Mg-MOF-74. At 300 K and 20 Pa, the saturated loading of benzene reaches 8.2 mmol/g, almost twice of (12,12) single-walled carbon nanotube with a similar pore size, and 93% of the benzene molecules in Mg-MOF-74 can desorb at 390 K. The energy analysis indicates that the van der Waals contribution still dominates 70-80% of the total fluid-wall interaction energy compared with the Coulombic contribution. We further analyzed the structure of benzene confined in Mg-MOF-74 by the molecular snapshots, pair correlation functions, orientational order parameters, and local density profiles. It is found that low temperature and high pressure make the structure of adsorbed benzene more similar to that of the liquid benzene. Moreover, the benzene molecules in the contact adsorption layer lie flat on the surface of adsorbent, whereas those molecules near the pore center have no particular orientations. Due to the existence of open metal sites, the structures of adsorbed benzene are more compact and ordered than those of bulk liquid benzene. Consequently, the self-diffusion coefficient of saturated benzene in Mg-MOF-74 at 300 K is significantly lower than that of bulk liquid benzene and confined liquid benzene in slit pores and disordered carbons by 4-5 orders of magnitude. We investigated the separation and diffusion of benzene/cyclohexane in the mixture in Mg-MOF-74 and found that the pores almost completely adsorbed benzene, although its self-diffusion coefficient was slightly lower than that of cyclohexane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据