4.8 Article

Photoactivatable Reaction for Covalent Nanoscale Patterning of Multiple Proteins

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 47, 页码 40452-40459

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b16736

关键词

immobilization; proteins; surface chemistry; photochemistry; monolayers

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [AFOSR FA9550-16-1-0150]
  2. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [U54CA199091]
  3. International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program 2016 from the Office of China Postdoctoral Council
  4. NIH/NCI [5T32CA186897-02]
  5. American Cancer Society-2017 Seattle Gala Paddle Raise Postdoctoral Fellowship [PF-18-118-01-CDD]
  6. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-1324585]
  7. Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource (NSF) [NNCI-1542205]
  8. State of Illinois
  9. International Institute for Nanotechnology (IIN)
  10. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U54CA199091, T32CA186897] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article describes a photochemical approach for independently patterning multiple proteins to an inert substrate, particularly for studies of cell adhesion. A photoactivatable chloropyrimidine ligand was employed for covalent immobilization of SnapTag fusion proteins on self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on gold. A two-step procedure was used: first, patterned UV illumination of the surface activated protein capture ligands, and second, incubation with a SnapTag fusion protein bound to the surface in illuminated regions. Two different fluorescent proteins were patterned in registry with features of 400 nm in size over a 1 mm(2) area. An example is given wherein an anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (anti-CEA) scFv antibody was patterned to direct the selective attachment of a human cancer cell line that express the CEA antigen. This method enables the preparation of surfaces with control over the density and activity of independently patterned proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据