4.8 Article

Biomimetic Root-like TiN/C@S Nanofiber as a Freestanding Cathode with High Sulfur Loading for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 44, 页码 37955-37962

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b11118

关键词

lithium-sulfur batteries; freestanding cathode; high sulfur loading; root-like nanofiber; titanium nitride

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21773077, 51532005]
  2. 973 program [2015CB258400]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016T90689]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is a tough issue to achieve high electrochemical performance and high sulfur loading simultaneously, which is of important significance for practical Li-S batteries applications. Inspired by the transportation system of the plant root in nature, a biomimetic root-like carbon/titanium nitride (TiN/C) composite nanofiber is designed as a freestanding current collector for the high sulfur loading cathode. Like the plant root which absorbs water and oxygen from soil and transfers them to the trunk and branches, the root-like TiN/C matrix provides high-efficiency polysulfide, electron, and electrolyte transfer for the redox reactions via its three-dimensional-porous interconnected structure. In the meantime, TiN can not only anchor the polysulfides via the polar Ti-S and N-S bond but also further facilitate the redox reaction because of its high catalytic effect. With 4 mg cm(-2) sulfur loading, the TiN/C@S cathode delivers a high initial discharge capacity of 983 mA h g(-1) at 0.2 C current density; after 300 charge/discharge cycles, the discharge capacity remains 685 mA h g(-1), corresponding to a capacity decay rate of similar to 0.1%. Even when the sulfur loading is increased to 10.5 mg cm(-2), the cell still delivers a high capacity of 790 mA h g(-1) and a decent cycle life. We believe that this novel biomimetic root-like structure can provide some inspiration for the rational structure design of the high-energy lithium-sulfur batteries and other composite electrode materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据