4.8 Article

Individual High-Quality N-Doped Carbon Nanotubes Embedded with Nonprecious Metal Nanoparticles toward Electrochemical Reaction

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 46, 页码 39757-39767

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b14536

关键词

N-doped carbon nanotubes; carbon-coated metal nanoparticle; ZIF-8; electrocatalytic reactions; interface effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1662109]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, China [16JCQNJC06200]
  3. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities of China (111 program) [B17019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developing highly active and stable nonprecious metal catalysts for electrochemical reactions is desirable but remains a great challenge. Herein, we report a novel metal-ion adsorption-pyrolysis strategy for the controllable zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 derived synthesis of individual high quality N-doped carbon nanotubes embedded with well dispersed nonprecious metal nanoparticles, which exhibit superior electrocatalytic activity and stability for electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction, oxygen reduction reaction, and oxygen evolution reaction. Experimental analysis and density functional theory calculations indicate that the remarkable electrocatalytic activities are mainly attributed to the interface effects for the efficient electron transfer from metal nanoparticles to the N-doped carbon shell, as well as the large specific areas, unique tube structures, appropriate doping, high graphitization degree, and robust frameworks. The high reaction stability is attributed to the multiwalled graphitic carbon shells efficiently preventing metal nanoparticles from aggregation, corrosion, and oxidation. This novel synthetic strategy presents a facile universality for synthesizing N-doped carbon nanotube structures and will provide a guideline for developing low-cost, highly active, and stable electrocatalytic materials for sustainable energy conversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据