4.8 Article

Field-Effect Charge Transport in Doped Polymer Semiconductor-Insulator Alternating Bulk Junctions with Ultrathin Transport Layers

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 45, 页码 39091-39099

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b13601

关键词

field-effect transistors; conjugated-polymers; ultrathin layers; charge transport; doping

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51473132, 21574103]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M580841, 2016T90910]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conjugated-polymer field-effect transistors are attractive for flexible electronics. However, relatively high chemical doping (oxidation) concentration of p-type polymer semiconductors is usually not compatible with good transistor performance, due to poor switching-off capability and short-channel performance. Here, we propose a combined simulation and experimental investigation on charge transport in a semiconductor-insulator alternating bulk junction composed of repeating semiconductor and insulator regions, which shows better transistor performance at higher doping levels, as compared with traditional planar transistors. Moreover, the doped semiconductor transport layers in the junction should be less than 2 nm thick to ensure sufficient pinch off capability. Using some semiconductors including poly(3-hexylthiophene), we utilize a fast solvent evaporation approach to obtain semiconductor-insulator alternating bulk junctions with ultrathin (thickness < 2 nm) semiconductor crystallites and with vertical gradients of both morphology and electronic properties. Doping with a concentration of up to 10(19) cm(-3) simultaneously induces the improvement of field-effect mobility, on/off ratio, and subthreshold swing, which leads to long-term (>1 year) stability, without lowering the short-channel performance. Moreover, these heterojunctions are optically transparent, nearly colorless, and flexible, thus could be exploited for wide electronic and photonic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据