4.8 Article

Hierarchical Porous Prism Arrays Composed of Hybrid Ni-NiO-Carbon as Highly Efficient Electrocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 45, 页码 38906-38914

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b13542

关键词

metal-organic framework; hierarchical arrays; Ni-NiO interface; electrolysis; water splitting

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB932304, 2016YFA0202603]
  2. NSFC [91645104]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201704030019]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2017A010103007]
  5. Guangdong Science and Technology Innovation Leading Talent Fund [2016TX03N187]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Searching for an economical and efficient water splitting electrocatalyst is still a huge challenge for hydrogen production. This work reports one-step synthesis of hierarchical porous prism arrays (HPPAs) composed of Ni-NiO nanoparticles embedding uniformly in graphite carbon (Ni-NiO/C HPPAs), which is derived from metal-organic framework (CPO-27-Ni) prism arrays grown on nickel foam (NF). Remarkable features of the prism arrays, synergistic effect of Ni-NiO/C, porous graphite carbon, high conductive NF, and good contact between catalyst and current collector result in excellent electrocatalytic performance of Ni-NiO/C HPPAs@NF. Ni-NiO/C HPPAs@NF shows a small overpotential of similar to 49.48 mV at the current density of 10 mA cm(-2), low Tafel slope of 74 mV dec(-1) and robust stability for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in alkaline media. Especially, the overpotential for HER of Ni-NiO/C HPPAs@NF is only similar to 132 mV at the current density of 185 mA cm(-2), almost the same as the value from the Pt/C. Furthermore, for oxygen evolution reaction in basic media, Ni-NiO/C HPPAs@NF shows better catalytic activity, lower Tafel slope and higher durability than precious IrO2. The above finding offers an effective strategy to design the bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据