4.8 Article

Scalable Engineering of Bulk Porous Si Anodes for High Initial Efficiency and High-Areal-Capacity Lithium-Ion Batteries

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 714-721

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b16942

关键词

bulk porous Si; wet chemical etching; interfacial Si-N-C engineering; high initial Coulombic efficiency; high areal capacity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61534005, 21233004, 61474081]
  2. General Armaments Department of China [6140721040411]
  3. Fujian Provincial Department of Education [JA15651]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nano-Si has been long-hampered in its use for practical lithium battery anodes due to its intrinsic high surface area. To improve the Coulombic efficiency and areal mass loading, we extend the starting materials from nano-Si to photovoltaic waste Si powders (similar to 1.5 mu m). Unique morphology design and interfacial engineering are designed to overcome the particle fracture of micrometer Si. First, we develop a Cu-assisted chemical wet-etching method to prepare micrometer-size bulk-porous Si (MBPS), which provides interconnected porous space to accommodate volume expansion. In addition, a monolithic, multicore, interacting MBPS/carbonized polyacrylonitrile (c-PAN) electrode with strong interfacial Si-N-C is designed to improve the interparticle electrical conductivity during volume expansion and shrinkage. Furthermore, intermediate Si nanocrystals are well-maintained during the lithiation of MBPS, which facilitates the reversibility of lithiation-delithiation process. As a result, the MBPS/c-PAN electrodes exhibit a reversible specific capacity of 2126 mAh g(-1) with a high initial Coulombic efficiency of 92%. Moreover, even after increasing the capacity loading to 3.4 mAh cm(-2), the well-designed electrode shows a capacity retention of 94% in the first 50 cycles at a current density of 0.2 A g(-1) with deep lithiation and delithiation processes between 0.005 and 2.5 V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据