4.5 Article

Rapid sex-specific evolution of age at maturity is shaped by genetic architecture in Atlantic salmon

期刊

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
卷 2, 期 11, 页码 1800-1807

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0681-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [284941, 286334, 307593, 302873, 318939]
  2. European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [742312]
  3. University of Helsinki
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [318939, 286334, 307593, 318939, 307593, 286334] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the mechanisms by which populations adapt to their environments is a fundamental aim in biology. However, it remains challenging to identify the genetic basis of traits, provide evidence of genetic changes and quantify phenotypic responses. Age at maturity in Atlantic salmon represents an ideal trait to study contemporary adaptive evolution as it has been associated with a single locus in the vgll3 region and has also strongly changed in recent decades. Here, we provide an empirical example of contemporary adaptive evolution of a large-effect locus driving contrasting sex-specific evolutionary responses at the phenotypic level. We identified an 18% decrease in the vgll3 allele associated with late maturity in a large and diverse salmon population over 36 years, induced by sex-specific selection during sea migration. Those genetic changes resulted in a significant evolutionary response only in males, due to sex-specific dominance patterns and vgll3 allelic effects. The vgll3 allelic and dominance effects differed greatly in a second population and were likely to generate different selection and evolutionary patterns. Our study highlights the importance of knowledge of genetic architecture to better understand fitness trait evolution and phenotypic diversity. It also emphasizes the potential role of adaptive evolution in the trend towards earlier maturation observed in numerous Atlantic salmon populations worldwide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据