4.3 Article

A comparative study of carbon footprint and assessment standards

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ijlct/ctt041

关键词

carbon footprint; carbon emissions; assessment standards; comparative study

资金

  1. Soft Science Research Projects of Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China [2011-R1-15]
  2. Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China [11YJCZH125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on the research methods and steps involved in carrying out studies on different types of carbon footprints. Furthermore, a comparative study of different carbon footprint assessment standards was carried out to identify their similarities, differences and deficiencies. Goals, principles, research boundaries, calculation methods, data selection and other aspects of organizations footprint and product carbon footprint were analysed, respectively. Organizations carbon footprint assessment standards-ISO14064 and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) protocol and product carbon footprint assessment standards-PAS2050, TSQ0010, ISO14047 and Product and Supply Chain GHG Protocol were analysed comparatively. The selection of GHG, system settings, quantification and carbon footprint, selection of date and treatment of specific emissions are the most important part of the study of the carbon footprint and assessment standards, especially for organizations and products. Guidelines had been made on these issues from existing assessment standards, but further improvement is still needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据