4.5 Article

Steam gasification of various feedstocks at a dual fluidised bed gasifier: Impacts of operation conditions and bed materials

期刊

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
卷 1, 期 1, 页码 39-53

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-011-0007-1

关键词

Biomass gasification; Pilot plant; Fuel variation; Fluidised bed; Bed material; Catalyst

资金

  1. European Union [JOR3-CT97-0196, 518309, 019761, ENK5-CT2000-0314, RFCR-CT-2007-0005, 211517]
  2. Renewable Energy Network Austria (ReNet)
  3. Gvolution and G-volution II under the Austrian Climate and Energy fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gasification of biomass is an attractive technology for combined heat and power production as well as for synthesis processes such as production of liquid and gaseous biofuels. Dual fluidised bed (DFB) technology offers the advantage of a nearly nitrogen-free product gas mainly consisting of H-2, CO, CO2 and CH4. The DFB steam gasification process has been developed at Vienna University of Technology over the last 15 years using cold flow models, laboratory units, mathematical modelling and simulation. The main findings of the experimental work at a 100-kW pilot scale unit are presented. Different fuels (wood pellets, wood chips, lignite, coal, etc.) and different bed materials (natural minerals such as olivine, limestones, calcites, etc. as well as modified olivines) have been tested and the influence on tar content as well as gas composition was measured and compared among the different components. Moreover, the influence of operating parameters such as fuel moisture content, steam/fuel ratio and gasification temperature on the product gas has been investigated. DFB steam gasification of solid biomass coupled with CO2 capture, the so-called absorption enhanced reforming (AER) process, is highlighted. The experiments in pilot scale led to commercial realisation of this technology in demonstration scale. Summarising, the DFB system offers excellent fuel flexibility to be used in advanced power cycles as well as in polygeneration applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据