4.1 Article

Laparoscopic Primary Repair with Omentopexy for Duodenal Ulcer Perforation: A Single Institution Experience of 21 Cases

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTRIC CANCER
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 237-242

出版社

KOREAN GASTRIC CANCER ASSOC
DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2012.12.4.237

关键词

Duodenal ulcer; Perforation; Laproscopy; Primary repair

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Despite the great advances in laparoscopic techniques, most active general surgeons do not apply laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of duodenal ulcer perforation when facing a real-life emergency. Therefore, our study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery in duodenal ulcer perforation, and provide a step-by-step protocol with tips and recommendations for less experienced surgeons. Materials and Methods: Between March, 2011 and May, 2012, 21 patients presenting with duodenal ulcer perforation underwent laparoscopic primary repair with omentopexy. There were no contraindications to perform laparoscopic surgery, and the choice of primary repair was decided according to the size of the perforation. The procedure for laparoscopic primary repair with omentopexy consisted of peritoneal lavage, primary suture, and omentopexy using a knot pusher. Results: During the operation, no conversion to open surgery or intra-operative events occurred. The median operation time was 45.0 minutes (20 similar to 80 minutes). Median day of commencement of a soft diet was day 6 (4 similar to 17 days). After surgery, the median hospital stay was 8.0 days (5 similar to 27 days). Postoperative complications occurred in one patient, which included a minor leakage. This complication was resolved by conservative management. Conclusions: Although our study was carried out on a small number of patients at a single institution, we conclude that laparoscopic primary repair can be an effective surgical method in the treatment of duodenal ulcer perforation. We believe that the detailed explanation of our procedure will help beginners to perform laparoscopic primary repair more easily.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据