4.5 Article

Early detection of postpartum depressive symptoms in mothers and fathers and its relation to midwives' evaluation and service provision: a community-based study

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2015.00062

关键词

postpartum emotional distress; midwives; postpartum support

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Postpartum parental mental health problems pose a serious risk for child development and often remain undetected in postpartum primary care. Within the framework of the German Midwifes Prevention Study, the aim of this study was to investigate the presence of postpartum emotional distress in mothers and fathers, and the detection of distressed parents by midwives in a primary care setting. We also examined whether a temporal extension of the postpartum midwife care period is associated with greater use of midwife contacts and higher rates of referral to further professional support if needed. Methods: Mothers, fathers, and midwives filled out questionnaires at 2 weeks (t(1)) and 6 months (t(2)) postpartum. Compared to standard care in the control group (CG), midwives in an intervention group (IG) offered extended postpartum care of 6 months postpartum. Parental psychological distress was assessed using the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS). Midwives reported on parental psychological distress as well as the number of postpartum contacts and referrals to additional social-and health-care providers. Results: Based on their ratings, midwives identified half of mothers and around one quarter of fathers with elevated depressive symptoms according to the EPDS at t(1) and t(2). IG mothers used significantly more midwife contacts than CG mothers. IG mothers with high-postnatal psychological distress at t(2) used significantly more contacts than mothers with lower levels of distress. IG mothers with high-psychological distress at t(2) were referred to additional support services more often than mothers with lower levels of distress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据