4.2 Article

Lessons from a peer-led obesity prevention programme in English schools

期刊

HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 250-259

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dau008

关键词

school based; adolescent; obesity prevention; health education

资金

  1. Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence
  2. British Heart Foundation
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-590-28-0005]
  5. Medical Research Council
  6. Welsh Government
  7. Wellcome Trust of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration [WT087640MA]
  8. Wellcome Trust
  9. MRC [MR/K023233/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [DRF-2010-03-51] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  11. Medical Research Council [MR/K023233/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. National Institute for Health Research [DRF-2010-03-51] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity in young people is a major public health concern. Energy balance, the interrelationship between diet and physical activity, is known to be a key determinant. Evidence supports the development of school-based approaches to obesity prevention. ASSIST (A Stop Smoking in Schools Trial) is an effective school-based, peer-led smoking prevention programme for 12-13-year-old students, based on diffusion of innovations theory. The AHEAD (Activity and Healthy Eating in ADolescence) study tested the feasibility of adapting ASSIST to an obesity prevention intervention. The AHEAD intervention was tested and refined during a pilot study in one school, followed by an exploratory trial in six schools. Quantitative (self-report behavioural questionnaires and evaluation forms) and qualitative (structured observations, focus groups and interviews) research methods were used to examine the implementation and acceptability of the intervention. The potential effectiveness of the intervention in increasing healthy eating was measured using self-report behavioural questionnaires. Activity monitors (accelerometers) were used to measure physical activity. Results show it was feasible to implement the AHEAD intervention, which was well received. However, implementation was resource and labour intensive and relatively expensive. Furthermore, there was no evidence of promise that the intervention would increase physical activity or healthy eating in adolescents. Although diet and physical activity are both relevant for obesity prevention, the focus on two behaviours appeared too complex for informal diffusion through peer networks. This identifies a tension, particularly for adolescent peer-led health promotion, between the desire not to isolate or oversimplify health behaviours and the need to present clear, succinct health promotion messages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据