4.7 Article

Groundwater decline and tree change in floodplain landscapes: Identifying non-linear threshold responses in canopy condition

期刊

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
卷 2, 期 -, 页码 148-160

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2014.09.002

关键词

Canopy condition; Dieback; Drought; Tipping point; Ecological threshold; Groundwater dependent ecosystems

资金

  1. MDB Futures-Collaborative Research Network (CRN)
  2. University of Southern Queensland's International Centre for Applied Climate Sciences and Digital Futures CRN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Groundwater decline is widespread, yet its implications for natural systems are poorly understood. Previous research has revealed links between groundwater depth and tree condition; however, critical thresholds which might indicate ecological 'tipping points' associated with rapid and potentially irreversible change have been difficult to quantify. This study collated data for two dominant floodplain species, Eucalyptus camaldulensis (river red gum) and E. populnea (poplar box) from 118 sites in eastern Australia where significant groundwater decline has occurred. Boosted regression trees, quantile regression and Threshold Indicator Taxa Analysis were used to investigate the relationship between tree condition and groundwater depth. Distinct non-linear responses were found, with groundwater depth thresholds identified in the range from 12.1 m to 22.6 m for E. camaldulensis and 12.6 m to 26.6 m for E. populnea beyond which canopy condition declined abruptly. Non-linear threshold responses in canopy condition in these species may be linked to rooting depth, with chronic groundwater decline decoupling trees from deep soil moisture resources. The quantification of groundwater depth thresholds is likely to be critical for management aimed at conserving groundwater dependent biodiversity. Identifying thresholds will be important in regions where water extraction and drying climates may contribute to further groundwater decline. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据