4.2 Article

Research barriers in children and young people with life-limiting conditions: a survey

期刊

BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE
卷 12, 期 E5, 页码 E715-E721

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001521

关键词

paediatrics; clinical decisions; ethics; methodological research; symptoms and symptom management

资金

  1. Great Ormond Street Children's Charity [G25 513947 2LGC]
  2. North Thames Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR) [52AZ95]
  3. True Colors Trust [G25 511830 2LGA]
  4. Health Foundation [G25 512881 2LAAB]
  5. Oak Foundation [OCAY-14-574]
  6. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) North Thames at Bart's Health NHS Trust
  7. Health Foundation
  8. NIHR Great Ormond Street Biomedical Research Centre
  9. [MCCC-FCO-16-U]
  10. [MCCC-FCO-11-U]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies suggest that obtaining research ethics committee (REC) approval and overcoming clinician gatekeeping are major challenges in recruiting children and young people (CYP) with life-limiting conditions (LLCs) and life-threatening illnesses (LTIs) for research. Chief investigators (CIs) in the UK reported limitations on funding, governance procedures, and clinician gatekeeping as barriers, and proposed solutions such as involving CYP and their families in study design and improving relationships with clinicians. These findings have broader implications beyond the UK and highlight the importance of collaboration and visibility in pediatric palliative care research.
Studies indicate research ethics committee (REC) approval and clinician gatekeeping are two key barriers in recruiting children and young people (CYP) with life-limiting conditions (LLCs) and life-threatening illnesses (LTIs) and their families to research. Objectives To explore the reported experiences, difficulties and proposed solutions of chief investigators (CIs) recruiting CYP with LLCs/LTIs and families in the UK. Methods 61 CIs conducting studies with CYP with LLCs/LTIs and their families, identified from the UK National Institute of Health Research portfolio, completed an anonymous, web-based questionnaire, including both closed and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics and inductive and deductive coding were used to analyse responses. Results UK CIs cited limitations on funding, governance procedures including Research and Development, Site-Specific and REC approval processes, and clinician gatekeeping as challenges to research. CIs offered some solutions to overcome identified barriers such as working with CYP and their families to ensure their needs are adequately considered in study design and communicated to ethics committees; and designing studies with broad inclusion criteria and developing effective relationships with clinicians in order to overcome clinician gatekeeping. Conclusions Many of the challenges and solutions reported by UK CIs have applicability beyond the UK setting. The involvement of clinicians, patients and their families at the inception of and throughout paediatric palliative care research studies is essential. Other important strategies include having clinician research champions and increasing the visibility of research. Further research on the perspectives of all stakeholders, leading to mutually agreed guidance, is required if care and treatment are to improve.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据