3.9 Article

Survivorship Programs and Care Plans in Practice: Variations on a Theme

期刊

JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 70-75

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2010.000115

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Lance Armstrong Foundation
  2. Breast Cancer Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This qualitative study examined cancer survivorship programs at four health care organizations in Los Angeles County, CA: an academic medical center, a community hospital, a primary-care medical group, and a county hospital. The purpose was to describe the successful implementation of four distinctly different models of care, focusing on the creative development and use of the Institute of Medicine-recommended survivorship care plan (SCP) document in each setting. Methods: In-depth semistructured interviews were done with survivorship teams to characterize each program and the development and use of the SCP at each institution. Results: Each survivorship program has developed and implemented unique types of SCP documents. Specifically, a com-prehensive SCP at the academic center, completed by the clinical team, which covers many facets of cancer survivorship; a patient-directed SCP at the community hospital, completed by the survivor with assistance of an oncology nurse and focused on treatment history and appropriate surveillance; an adapted ASCO SCP template at the primary-care medical group, completed via a partnership with contracted oncologists and focused on the treatment history, surveillance, and shared care between oncology and primary care; an adapted ASCO SCP template at the county hospital, completed by the survivorship nurse practitioner and focused on patient education, post-treatment care, and institutional care coordination. Conclusion: The SCP document is a flexible tool that can be successfully adapted for use in extremely varied settings, from primary care to hospitals, to inform and educate patients and providers alike.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据