4.4 Article

Clinical and mutation analysis of 51 probands with anophthalmia and/or severe microphthalmia from a single center

期刊

MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE
卷 1, 期 1, 页码 15-31

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.2

关键词

Anophthalmia; array CGH; BMP4; coloboma; de novo mutations; FOXE3; gene deletion; haploinsufficiency; microphthalmia; missense mutations; OTX2; PAX6; RAX; SMOC1; SOX2; STRA6; transcription factors

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_U127527199, MC_U127561093, MC_PC_U127561093, MC_U127527199] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [MC_U127561093, MC_U127527199, MC_PC_U127527199, MC_PC_U127561093] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical evaluation and mutation analysis was performed in 51 consecutive probands with severe eye malformations - anophthalmia and/or severe microphthalmia - seen in a single specialist ophthalmology center. The mutation analysis consisted of bidirectional sequencing of the coding regions of SOX2, OTX2, PAX6 (paired domain), STRA6, BMP4, SMOC1, FOXE3, and RAX, and genome-wide array-based copy number assessment. Fifteen (29.4%) of the 51 probands had likely causative mutations affecting SOX2 (9/51), OTX2 (5/51), and STRA6 (1/51). Of the cases with bilateral anophthalmia, 9/12 (75%) were found to be mutation positive. Three of these mutations were large genomic deletions encompassing SOX2 (one case) or OTX2 (two cases). Familial inheritance of three intragenic, plausibly pathogenic, and heterozygous mutations was observed. An unaffected carrier parent of an affected child with an identified OTX2 mutation confirmed the previously reported nonpenetrance for this disorder. Two families with SOX2 mutations demonstrated a parent and child both with significant but highly variable eye malformations. Heterozygous loss-of- function mutations in SOX2 and OTX2 are the most common genetic pathology associated with severe eye malformations and bi-allelic loss-of-function in STRA6 is confirmed as an emerging cause of nonsyndromal eye malformations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据