4.5 Article

Ion temperature effects on magnetotail Alfven wave propagation and electron energization

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS
卷 120, 期 7, 页码 5623-5632

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JA021074

关键词

electron acceleration; kinetic Alfven waves; kinetic simulations; magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling; ion gyroradius effects

资金

  1. NASA [NNH11AR071, NNX14AM27G, NNH14AY20I, NNX13XAE12G, NNX15AJ01G]
  2. NSF [AGS1203299]
  3. Australian Research Council [FT110100316]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-09CH11466]
  5. CISL project [UPR10002]
  6. NASA [NNX14AM27G, 679191] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  7. Australian Research Council [FT110100316] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Physics [1523261] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Division Of Physics
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1144374] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new 2-D self-consistent hybrid gyrofluid-kinetic electron model in dipolar coordinates is presented and used to simulate dispersive-scale Alfven wave pulse propagation from the equator to the ionosphere along an L = 10 magnetic field line. The model is an extension of the hybrid MHD-kinetic electron model that incorporates ion Larmor radius corrections via the kinetic fluid model of Cheng and Johnson (1999). It is found that consideration of a realistic ion to electron temperature ratio decreases the propagation time of the wave from the plasma sheet to the ionosphere by several seconds relative to a (i)=0 case (which also implies shorter timing for a substorm onset signal) and leads to significant dispersion of wave energy perpendicular to the ambient magnetic field. Additionally, ion temperature effects reduce the parallel current and electron energization all along the field line for the same magnitude perpendicular electric field perturbation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据