4.7 Article

BIOMARKER SIGNATURE IDENTIFICATION IN OMICS DATA WITH MULTI-CLASS OUTCOME

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.5936/csbj.201303004

关键词

Constraint-based Methods; Graphical Models; Biomarker Signature Identification; Multiple Outcomes Studies; High Dimensional Data; Omics Data

资金

  1. FP7 Integrated Project REACTION (Remote AccessibilitytoDiabetes Management and Therapy in Operational Healthcare Networks-European Commission) [248590]
  2. Greek GSRT [20332]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomarker signature identification in omics data is a complex challenge that requires specialized feature selection algorithms. The objective of these algorithms is to select the smallest set(s) of molecular quantities that are able to predict a given outcome (target) with maximal predictive performance. This task is even more challenging when the outcome comprises of multiple classes; for example, one may be interested in identifying the genes whose expressions allow discrimination among different types of cancer (nominal outcome) or among different stages of the same cancer, e.g. Stage 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Lung Adenocarcinoma (ordinal outcome). In this work, we consider a particular type of successful feature selection methods, named constraint-based, local causal discovery algorithms. These algorithms depend on performing a series of conditional independence tests. We extend these algorithms for the analysis of problems with continuous predictors and multi-class outcomes, by developing and equipping them with an appropriate conditional independence test procedure for both nominal and ordinal multi-class targets. The test is based on multinomial logistic regression and employs the log-likelihood ratio test for model selection. We present a comparative, experimental evaluation on seven real-world, high-dimensional, gene-expression datasets. Within the scope of our analysis the results indicate that the new conditional independence test allows the identification of smaller and better performing signatures for multi-class outcome datasets, with respect to the current alternatives for performing the independence tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据