4.6 Article

Mysteries of TGF-beta paradox in benign and malignant cells

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00094

关键词

TGF-beta paradox,TGF-beta receptors; Erk activation; Smad activation; PP2A recruitment,TGF-beta auto-induction; negative feedback; positive feedback

类别

资金

  1. NCI SPORE [P50-CA90386]
  2. NCI EDRN [U01-CA152738]
  3. NCI SPECS [U01-CA114810]
  4. DOD [W81XWH-09-1-0311]
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U01CA152738, U01CA114810, P50CA090386] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TGF-beta regulates a wide range of biological functions including embryonic development, wound healing, organogenesis, immune modulation, and cancer progression. Interestingly, TGF-beta is known to inhibit cell growth in benign cells but promote progression in cancer cells; this phenomenon is known as TGF-beta paradox. To date, the mechanism of this paradox still remains a scientific mystery. In this review, we present our experience, along with the literature, in an attempt to answer this mystery. First, we observed that, on TGF-beta engagement, there is a differential activation of Erk between benign and cancer cells. Since activated Erk is a major mediator in tumor progression and metastasis, a differentially activated Erk represents the answer to this mystery. Second, we identified a key player, PP2A-B56 alpha, which is differentially recruited by the activated type I TGF-beta receptor (TB RI) in benign and tumor cells, resulting in differential Erk activation. Finally, TGF-beta stimulation leads to suppressed TBRs in tumor cells but not in benign cells. This differentially suppressed TBRs triggers differential recruitment of PP2A-B56a and, thus, differential activation of Erk. The above three events explain the mysteries of TGF-beta paradox. Understanding the mechanism of TGF-beta paradox will help us to predict indolent from aggressive cancers and develop novel anti-cancer strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据