4.6 Article

SMolecular mechanisms of MYCN-dependent apoptosis and the MDN2-p53 pathway: an Achillei's heel to be exploited for the therapy of MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 2, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00141

关键词

Neuroblastoma; HIPK2; MYCN; HMGA1; MDM2-antagonists

类别

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro [IG12116]
  2. Telethon [GGP07118]
  3. National Research Council (CNR)
  4. MIUR FIRB
  5. PRIN
  6. Ministry of Health
  7. Fonda.zione Roma
  8. Eli Healing
  9. IIT (Italian Institute of Technology)
  10. ASI (Agenzia Spaziale Italiana)
  11. NUJ [P41 RR011823]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The p53 oncosuppressor is very seldom mutated in neuroblastoma, but several mechanisms cooperate to its functional inactivation in this tumor. Increased MDM2 levels, due to genetic amplification or constitutive inhibition of p14(ARF) significantly contribute to this event highlighting p53 reactivation as an attractive perspective for neuroblastoma treatment. In addition to its role in tumorigenesis, MYCN sensitizes untransformed and cancer cells to apoptosis. This is associated to a fine modulation of the MDM2 p53 pathway. Indeed MYCN induces p53 and MDM2 transcription, and, by evoking a DNA damage response (DDR), it stabilizes p53 and its proapoptotic kinase Homeodomain Interacting Protein Kinase 2 (HIPK2). Through the regulation of the HIPK2-p53 inhibitor High Mobility Group protein Al (HMGA1) and the homeobox proteins BMI-1 and TWIST-1, MYCN establishes a delicate balance between pro- and antiapoptotic molecules that might be easily perturbed by a variety of insults, leading to cell death. MDM2 p53 antagonists, such as Nutlin-3, are strikingly prone to inducing death in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma, by further pushing on HIPK2 accumulation. Here we discuss implications and caveats of exploiting this pathway and its connections to MYCN-induced DDR for a tailored therapy of MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据