4.6 Article

miRNA-130a Significantly Improves Accuracy of SGA Nutritional Assessment Tool in Prediction of Malnutrition and Cachexia in Radiotherapy-Treated Head and Neck Cancer Patients

期刊

CANCERS
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers10090294

关键词

head and neck cancer; cachexia; malnutrition; miRNA; SGA

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Investigation of novel cachexia-related markers is one of the major challenges in contemporary oncology. Among studied markers, the miRNA seems to be promising due to its possibility to regulate genes responsible for induction of inflammatory response, muscle atrophy and fat tissue wasting. The aim of the study was to investigate the role of blood-circulating miRNA-130a in prediction of cancer cachexia in 70 head and neck cancer patients (HNC) subjected to radiotherapy. Moreover, diagnostic accuracy of SGA (Subjective Global Assessment) scoring and miRNA-130a level was evaluated in various cachexia models. Results: miRNA-130a level negatively correlated with plasma TNF alpha-concentration (r = -0.560; p < 0.001). Patients with low miRNA expression had over 3-fold higher risk of body mass index (BMI) decrease below 18.5 after the termination of therapy; over 6-fold higher risk of losing over 5% of body weight and higher risk of >10% weight reduction odds ratio (OR) = 14.18 compared to other cases. ROC analysis performed for miRNA-130a allowed to distinguish cachectic patients (body weight loss >5%) from moderately or mildly malnourished ones with optimal sensitivity of 79.4% and specificity of 80.8% area under the curve (AUC) = 0.865). miRNA significantly improved nutritional assessment conducted using SGA, achieving the following values: sensitivity 88.6%, specificity 94.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) 93.9%, negative predictive value (NPV).89.2%. Conclusion: miRNA-130a demonstrates potential clinical utility in prediction of cachexia prior to the therapy in HNC patients. Simultaneous use of both tools-SGA and miRNA-significantly improved the accuracy in the diagnosis of cachexia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据