4.6 Article

Tau pathology does not affect experience-driven single-neuron and network-wide Arc/Arg3.1 responses

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/2051-5960-2-63

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Tau; Neurofibrillary tangles; Arc; Neuronal activity; Activity-dependent expression

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R00AG33670, R01 AG026249, R00 AG033670, AG005134, AG026249, P50 AG005134] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Alzheimers Research UK [ARUK-SPG2013-1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG026249, R00AG033670, P50AG005134] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) - a characteristic pathological feature of Alzheimer's and several other neurodegenerative diseases - are considered a major target for drug development. Tangle load correlates well with the severity of cognitive symptoms and mouse models of tauopathy are behaviorally impaired. However, there is little evidence that NFTs directly impact physiological properties of host neurons. Here we used a transgenic mouse model of tauopathy to study how advanced tau pathology in different brain regions affects activity-driven expression of immediate-early gene Arc required for experience-dependent consolidation of long-term memories. We demonstrate in vivo that visual cortex neurons with tangles are as likely to express comparable amounts of Arc in response to structured visual stimulation as their neighbors without tangles. Probability of experience-dependent Arc response was not affected by tau tangles in both visual cortex and hippocampal pyramidal neurons as determined postmortem. Moreover, whole brain analysis showed that network-wide activity-driven Arc expression was not affected by tau pathology in any of the brain regions, including brain areas with the highest tangle load. Our findings suggest that intraneuronal NFTs do not affect signaling cascades leading to experience-dependent gene expression required for long-term synaptic plasticity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据