4.6 Article

Analysis of microRNA from archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40478-014-0173-z

关键词

AMBRA1; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Autophagy; Bioinformatics; Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimen; MicroRNA

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [26430049, 24300131]
  2. Japan Science and Technology Program [AS2314204F]
  3. Brain Research Institute, Niigata University [2014 2508]
  4. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan
  5. Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of NCNP [24 5]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26430049] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are noncoding small RNAs that regulate gene expression. This study investigated whether formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens from postmortem cases of neurodegenerative disorders would be suitable for miRNA profiling. Results: Ten FFPE samples from 6 cases of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and 4 neurologically normal controls were selected for miRNA analysis on the basis of the following criteria for RNA quality: (i) a postmortem interval of less than 6 hours, (ii) a formalin fixation time of less than 4 weeks, (iii) an RNA yield per sample of more than 500 ng, and (iv) sufficient quality of the RNA agarose gel image. An overall RNA extraction success rate was 46.2%. For ALS, a total of 364 miRNAs were identified in the motor cortex, 91 being up-regulated and 233 down-regulated. Target genes were predicted using miRNA bioinformatics software, and the data applied to ontology analysis. This indicated that one of the miRNAs up-regulated in ALS (miR-338-3p) had already been identified in leukocytes, serum, cerebrospinal fluid and frozen spinal cord from ALS patients. Conclusion: Although analysis was possible for just under half of the specimens examined, we were able to show that informative miRNA data can be derived from archived FFPE samples from postmortem cases of neurodegenerative disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据