4.8 Article

Carrier Dynamics Engineering for High-Performance Electron-Transport-Layer-free Perovskite Photovoltaics

期刊

CHEM
卷 4, 期 10, 页码 2405-2417

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.004

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21573249]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB12020100]
  3. National Science Foundation [1709294]
  4. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences of the US Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001517]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Materials Research [1709294] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0001517] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electron-transport-layer-free (ETL-free) device architectures are promising designs for perovskite photovoltaics because they offer simpler configurations, low cost, and convenience for versatile optoelectronics. However, the development of ETL-free photovoltaics is hindered by their low performance. Herein, we reveal that a low electron-injection rate at the ETL-free interface is responsible for the performance loss. Moreover, we demonstrate that improving carrier lifetimes in the perovskite films can remedy the poor carrier extraction at interfaces, enabling carrier collection efficiency in ETL-free photovoltaics to approach that in ETL-containing devices. Using perovskite films with microsecond carrier lifetimes, we obtained ETL-free devices with a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 19.5%, nearly eliminated hysteresis, and good stability. Such a PCE value is comparable to that (20.7%) of the analogous ETL-containing photovoltaics. These results offer opportunities for ETL-free architecture designs in the perovskite photovoltaics family. More importantly, this research provides a general approach to improving the performance of photovoltaics with low-injection-rate interfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据