4.4 Article

The Role of Microwave Irradiation Temperature on Nitrogen Doping in Metal-Free Graphene Catalysts for an Efficient Oxygen Reduction Reaction in an Alkaline Condition

期刊

CHEMISTRYSELECT
卷 3, 期 31, 页码 8962-8972

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/slct.201801353

关键词

Electrocatalytic studies; Metal-free catalyst; Microwave irradiation; Nitrogen-doped graphene; Oxygen reduction reaction

资金

  1. CSIR, Madras complex, Chennai
  2. CIF, Pondicherry University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We reported the synthesis and characterization of metal-free nitrogen-doped graphene catalysts, and demonstrated their efficiency towards ORR in alkaline medium. The influence of varied microwave irradiation temperature on nitrogen doping efficiency in the graphene oxide (GO) catalyst has been investigated. Nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide (NrGO) catalysts with varied nitrogen content were synthesized under microwave irradiation temperature at 120-200 degrees C. The catalyst synthesized at 180 degrees C (NrGO-180) has the highest nitrogen content of 9.8 at% with a maximum proportion of pyridinic-N moiety in the graphene structure. The XPS analysis demonstrates the presence of different nitrogen-containing moieties such as pyridinic, pyrrolic and graphitic nitrogen, and their respective composition changes significantly with microwave-irradiation temperature. The linear sweep voltammograms studies demonstrated that NrGO-180 with a maximum amount of pyridinic-N has displayed excellent electrocatalytic activity towards ORR with an E-onset potential similar to 0.89 V (vs RHE) and half- wave potential E-1/2 = 0.72, which is at par with the studied commercial Pt/C (E-onset = 0.93 V, E-1/2 =0.82) and demonstrated 4-electron pathway. The catalyst NrGO-180 with enhanced electrochemical activity has been subjected to durability test of 5,000 potential cycles via LSV. The durability test confirms the superiority of NrGO-180 over commercial Pt/C catalyst under similar condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据