4.7 Article

Stratified and nonstratified areas in the North Sea: Long-term variability and biological and policy implications

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
卷 120, 期 7, 页码 4670-4686

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014JC010485

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU FP7 [308392]
  2. Defra project [ME5302, C5935]
  3. NERC [NE/M007855/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/M007855/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The European Unions' Marine Strategy Framework Directive aims to limit anthropogenic influences in the marine environment. But marine ecosystems are characterized by high variability, and it is not trivial to define its natural state. Here, we use the physical environment as a basis for marine classification, as it determines the conditions in which organisms must operate to survive and thrive locally. We present a delineation of the North Sea into five distinct regimes, based on multidecadal stratification characteristics. Results are based on a 51 year simulation of the region using the coupled hydrobiogeochemical model GETM-ERSEM-BFM. The five identified regimes are: permanently stratified, seasonally stratified, intermittently stratified, permanently mixed, and Region Of Freshwater Influence (ROFI). The areas characterized by these regimes show some interannual variation in geographical coverage, but are overall remarkable stable features within the North Sea. Results also show that 29% of North Sea waters fail to classify as one of the defined stratification regimes, due to high interannual variability. Biological characteristics of these regimes differ from diatom-based food webs in areas with prolonged stratification to Phaeocystis-dominated food webs in areas experiencing short-lived or no stratification. The spatial stability of the identified regimes indicates that carefully selected monitoring locations can be used to represent a substantive area of the North Sea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据