4.6 Article

Defect-Tolerant Bioinspired Hierarchical Composites: Simulation and Experiment

期刊

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 1, 期 5, 页码 295-304

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ab500120f

关键词

bioinspired design; defect tolerance; hierarchical composite; fracture toughness; 3D printing

资金

  1. BASF-NORA
  2. ARO through a MURI Award [W911NF-09-1-0541]
  3. ARO/ISN
  4. ONR-PECASE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Defect tolerance, the capacity of a material to maintain strength even under the presence of cracks or flaws, is one of the essential demands in the design of composite materials, as manufacturing induced defects, or those generated during operation, can lead to catastrophic failure and dramatically reduce the mechanical performance. In this paper, we combine computational modeling and advanced multimaterial 3D printing to examine the mechanics of several different classes of defect-tolerant bioinspired hierarchical composites, built from two base materials with contrasting mechanical properties (stiff and soft). We find that in contrast to the brittle base constituents of the composites, the existence of a hierarchical architecture leads to superior defect-tolerant properties. We show that composites with more hierarchical levels dramatically improve the defect tolerance of the material. We also examine the effect of adding both self-similar and dissimilar hierarchical levels to the materials architecture, and show that the geometries with multiple hierarchical levels can retain a significant portion of their fracture strength in the presence of either large edge cracklike flaws or multiple small distributed defects in the material. We compare the stress distributions in materials with different numbers of hierarchies in both simulation and experiment and find a more uniform stress distribution in the uncracked region of materials with higher hierarchy levels. These results provide micromechanical insights into the origin of the higher defect tolerance observed in simulation and experiment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据