4.1 Article

Multi-Robot Coordination in Complex Environment with Task and Communication Constraints

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.5772/54379

关键词

Multi-Robot System; Coordination and Cooperation; Task Allocation

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61173177]
  2. Defence Industrial Technology Development Program of China [B1420110149]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M511369]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tasks would fail to be assigned to any robots in the task allocation phase as a consequence of the inherent communication constraints in multi-robot systems (MRS). This negative effect becomes even more serious in tasks with temporal constraints. We therefore propose the constraint-based approach (CoBA), a market-based task allocation approach to enable multi-robot coordination in domains with temporal constraints between subtasks of a complex task and network constraints between robots. We handle network constraints by having each robot maintain a dynamic acquaintance network of robots that it knows about, and allowing a robot to submit a bid on behalf of another robot during a task auction (indirect bidding). In order to model the complex task, we introduce the AND/OR task tree with temporal constraints. An auction-clearing routine, which supports the AND/OR task tree with temporal constraints and direct/indirect task auction, is proposed to enable effective multi-robot task allocation in spite of various constraints. The solution was validated in both simulation and physical environments by a series of experiments in disaster response domains. Specifically, we study the system performance by separately varying the number of robots, the expected rate of task issuance, the communication reliability factor, the compositions of MRS, as well as the acquaintance relationship parameter, in simulation experiments. The results suggest that our solution outperforms others, that is, robots were able to complete the tasks more promptly and effectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据