4.7 Article

Ionospheric current source modeling and global geomagnetic induction using ground geomagnetic observatory data

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
卷 120, 期 10, 页码 6771-6796

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JB012063

关键词

global induction; external source fields; mantle conductivity; simultaneous inversion

资金

  1. NASA [NNX08AG04G]
  2. NSF [EAR-0739111, EAR-1447109]
  3. NASA [NNX08AG04G, 100432] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-period global-scale electromagnetic induction studies of deep Earth conductivity are based almost exclusively on magnetovariational methods and require accurate models of external source spatial structure. We describe approaches to inverting for both the external sources and three-dimensional (3-D) conductivity variations and apply these methods to long-period (T1.2days) geomagnetic observatory data. Our scheme involves three steps: (1) Observatory data from 60years (only partly overlapping and with many large gaps) are reduced and merged into dominant spatial modes using a scheme based on frequency domain principal components. (2) Resulting modes are inverted for corresponding external source spatial structure, using a simplified conductivity model with radial variations overlain by a two-dimensional thin sheet. The source inversion is regularized using a physically based source covariance, generated through superposition of correlated tilted zonal (quasi-dipole) current loops, representing ionospheric source complexity smoothed by Earth rotation. Free parameters in the source covariance model are tuned by a leave-one-out cross-validation scheme. (3) The estimated data modes are inverted for 3-D Earth conductivity, assuming the source excitation estimated in step 2. Together, these developments constitute key components in a practical scheme for simultaneous inversion of the catalogue of historical and modern observatory data for external source spatial structure and 3-D Earth conductivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据