4.5 Article

Sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes towards motherhood among single women compared with cohabiting women treated with donor semen - a Danish multicenter study

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12619

关键词

Medically assisted reproduction; donor semen; motherhood; single women; single mothers

资金

  1. Ferring Pharmaceuticals
  2. MSD Denmark ApS.
  3. Nordic Cryobank ApS.
  4. Juliane Marie Center, Copenhagen University Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveTo examine sociodemographic characteristics, family backgrounds, reproductive histories, and attitudes towards motherhood in single vs. cohabiting women seeking treatment with donor semen. DesignBaseline data collection in a multicenter cohort study. SettingAll nine public fertility clinics in Denmark. SampleIn total n=311 childless women initiating assisted reproduction using donor semen. MethodsSelf-reported questionnaire responses from n=184 single women seeking treatment by using donor semen were compared with responses from n=127 cohabiting women. Main outcome measuresSociodemographic characteristics, family backgrounds, reproductive histories, attitudes towards motherhood. ResultsSingle women were 3.5years older on average when initiating treatment compared with cohabiting women. No significant differences were found regarding sociodemographic characteristics, previous long-term relationships, previous pregnancies, or attitudes towards motherhood between single women and cohabiting women. The vast majority of single women wanted to achieve parenthood with a partner, 85.8% wished to have a partner in the future, and approximately half of them preferred for a partner to take parental responsibilities. ConclusionsIn this study single women seeking treatment with donor semen in the public health system did not differ from cohabiting women, except that they were older. To be a single mother by choice is not their preferred way of parenthood, but a solution they needed to accept.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据