4.2 Article

The Simplified Reference Tissue Model with 18F-Fallypride Positron Emission Tomography: Choice of Reference Region

期刊

MOLECULAR IMAGING
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.2310/7290.2013.00065

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P20 DA022539, R01 DA015179, R01 DA020726]
  2. University of California-Los Angeles General Clinical Research Center [M01 RR00865]
  3. Marjorie Green Trust
  4. Thomas P. and Katherine K. Pike Chair in Addiction Studies
  5. NIH [T32 DA024635]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of high-affinity radiotracers for positron emission tomography (PET) has allowed for quantification of dopamine receptors in extrastriatal and striatal regions of the brain. As these new radiotracers have distinctly different kinetic properties than their predecessors, it is important to examine the suitability of kinetic models to represent their uptake, distribution, and in vivo washout. Using the simplified reference tissue model, we investigated the influence of reference region choice on the striatal binding potential of F-18-fallypride, a high-affinity dopamine D-2/D-3 receptor ligand. We compared the use of the visual cortex and a white matter region (superior longitudinal fasciculus) to the cerebellum, a commonly used reference tissue, in a PET-fallypride study of healthy and methamphetamine-dependent subjects. Compared to the cerebellum, use of the visual cortex produced significantly greater sample variance in binding potential relative to nondisplaceable uptake (BPND). Use of the white matter region was associated with BPND values and sample variance similar to those obtained with the cerebellum and a larger effect size for the group differences in striatal BPND between healthy and methamphetamine-dependent subjects. Our results do not support the use of the visual cortex as a reference region in F-18-fallypride studies and suggest that white matter may be a reasonable alternative to the cerebellum as it displays similar statistical and kinetic properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据