4.2 Article

Imaging Depths of Near-Infrared Quantum Dots in First and Second Optical Windows

期刊

MOLECULAR IMAGING
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 338-352

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.2310/7290.2011.00057

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology [20110018601]
  3. Korea Health 21 R&D Project Ministry of Health Welfare [A101626]
  4. Priority Research Center Program through National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0029711, 20110027727]
  5. Basic Science Research Programs [20110027236]
  6. Korea Health Promotion Institute [A101626] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Potential advantages of quantum dot (QD) imaging in the second optical window (SOW) at 1,000 to 1,400 nm over the first optical window (FOW) at 700 to 900 nm have attracted much interest. QDs that emit at 800 nm (800QDs) and QDs that emit at 1,300 nm (1,300QDs) are used to investigate the imaging depths at the FOW and SOW. QD images in biologic tissues are processed binarized via global thresholding method, and the imaging depths are determined using the criteria of contrast to noise ratio and relative apparent size. Owing to the reduced scattering in the SOW, imaging depth in skin can be extended by approximately three times for 1,300QD/SOW over 800QD/FOW. In liver, excitation of 1,300QD/SOW can be shifted to longer wavelengths; thus, the imaging depth can be extended by 1.4 times. Effects of quantum yield (QY), concentration, incidence angle, polarization, and fluence rate F on imaging depth are comprehensively studied. Under F approved by the Food and Drug Administration, 1,300QDs with 50% QY can reach imaging depths of 29.7 mm in liver and 17.5 mm in skin. A time-gated excitation using 1,000 times higher F pulses can obtain the imaging depth of approximate to 5 cm. To validate our estimates, in vivo whole-body imaging experiments are performed using small-animal models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据