4.6 Article

Evaluation of MODIS aerosol retrieval algorithms over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region during low to very high pollution events

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
卷 120, 期 15, 页码 7941-7957

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023082

关键词

AERONET; MYD04 C6; SARA; AOD; fine particles; Beijing

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [PolyU5225/13E]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the performance of different MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) aerosol algorithms during fine particle pollution events over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region using Aerosol Robotic Network aerosol optical depth (AOD). These algorithms include the Deep Blue (DB) Collection 5.1 (C5) and Collection 6 (C6) algorithms at 10km resolution, the Dark Target (DT) C5 and C6 algorithms at 10km, the DT C6 algorithm at 3km, and the Simplified Aerosol Retrieval Algorithm (SARA) at 500m, 3km, and 10km resolutions. The DB C6 retrievals have 34-39% less uncertainties, 2-3 times smaller root-mean-square error (RMSE), and 3-4 times smaller mean absolute error (MAE) than DB C5 retrievals. The DT C6 has 4-8% lower bias, 4-12% less overestimation, and smaller RMSE and MAE errors than DT C5. Due to underestimation of surface reflectance and the use of inappropriate aerosol schemes, 87-89% of the collocations of the DT C6 at 3km fall above the expected error (EE), with overestimation of 64-79% which is 15-27% higher than that for the DT C6 at 10km. The results suggest that the DT C6 at 3km resolution is less reliable than that at 10km. The SARA AOD has small RMSE and MAE errors with 90-96% of the collocations falling within the EE. Overall, the SARA showed 15-16% less uncertainty than the DB C6 (10km), 69-72% less than the DT C6 (10km), and 79-83% less than the DT C6 (3km) retrievals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据